View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |  Product Discovery Opportunity Solution Tree |  Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | When discovery keeps swinging between goals, ideas, and learning loops, it creates clear steering logic. It connects the desired outcome, opportunities, and experiments into a legible structure. | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 1-5 Tage | 1-2 h Setup, laufend | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 4-12 | 2-6 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | Opportunity Solution Tree, Experiment Backlog, Learning Log | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections |
Tagsno overlap | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | DiscoveryOutcomesExperimentsOpportunity | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange |