View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Interview | ![]() Product Discovery Concierge MVP | ![]() UX Research User Interviews | ![]() Product Discovery Learning Card |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | The Learning Card connects traceable test results to a reasoned next action while keeping the limits of the insight visible. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 1-4 Wochen | 30–60 min per interview | 25-40 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 3-10 Kunden | 1 participant per interview | 1-5 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | Learning Card with evidence and next action |
Tags1 shared | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryLearning |



