Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Selected:Opportunity Interview ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)Learning Card Opportunity Solution Tree

Criterion	Product Discovery Opportunity Interview	Architecture ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)	Product Discovery Learning Card	Product Discovery Opportunity Solution Tree
Purposedifferent	When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities.	ARID examines how well developers can work with a technical design. It focuses on a part of the system that can still be revised, between the architecture overview and the detailed specification.	The Learning Card connects traceable test results to a reasoned next action while keeping the limits of the insight visible.	When discovery keeps swinging between goals, ideas, and learning loops, it creates clear steering logic. It connects the desired outcome, opportunities, and experiments into a legible structure.
Complexitydifferent	Medium	Medium	Low	Medium
Timedifferent	30-60 min je Interview	2–4 h review as a planning range; preparation and evaluation additional	25-40 min	1-2 h Setup, laufend
Participantsdifferent	5-12 Interviews	Designers, developers as users, and facilitation	1-5	2-6
Formatsame	Workshop + async	Workshop + async	Workshop + async	Workshop + async
Outputdifferent	Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes	Prioritized development tasks, Jointly produced code or pseudocode, Observed difficulties and open design questions, Proposed design revisions	Learning Card with evidence and next action	Opportunity Solution Tree, Experiment Backlog, Learning Log
Tagsno overlap	DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer	ArchitectureEngineeringFeedbackValidationTasks	ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryLearning	DiscoveryOutcomesExperimentsOpportunity

Add more methods