methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Opportunity Interview
Product Discovery
Opportunity Interview
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Paper illustration for Concierge MVP
Product Discovery
Concierge MVP
Purposedifferent
When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
30-60 min je Interview10-20 min daily30-60 min je Interview1-4 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
5-12 Interviews15-12 Interviews3-10 Kunden
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer QuotesDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsConcierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks
Tagsno overlap
DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
MVPValidationServiceDiscovery
Add more methods