View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Open Space Technology | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Teach-back | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. | Teach-back checks whether an explanation actually got through to the other person. The method makes misunderstandings visible early and strengthens shared understanding in advisory and learning situations. | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 5-20 min | 20-60 min | 10-20 min je Frage |
Participantsdifferent | 20-500+ | 2-8 | 1 | 6-50 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics | Understanding Check, Clarification Notes, Learning Gaps | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy | LearningUnderstandingCommunication | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | LearningDialogueFacilitation |



