methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Open Space Technology.
Facilitation
Open Space Technology
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper session grid with two time blocks, three rooms, colored session cards and an open topic pool.
Facilitation
Barcamp
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Purposedifferent
When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
0.5-2 Tage45-90 minHalber Tag bis 2 Tage20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
20-500+3-1015-2001-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action TopicsResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsSession Board, Session Notes, Community LearningsOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
FacilitationLarge groupLearning
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
Add more methods