View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Open Space Technology |  Innovation Crazy 8s |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Innovation Rapid Ideation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. | With only a few minutes available and a still-fuzzy solution search, the method forces a wide range of variants. It produces fast sketches before the first idea can settle in, making different directions directly comparable and open to further development. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When a decision needs to be prepared quickly, the method generates many solution-close variants in a short time. It deliberately relies on pace to undercut self-censorship and perfectionism. This quickly produces a usable field for prioritization and further work. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 8-15 min | 45-90 min | 5-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 20-500+ | 1-10 | 8-80 | 1-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics | Sketch Set, Idea Shortlist, Direction Options | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Ideenpool, Roh-Shortlist, Cluster |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy | BrainstormingSketchingSpeedDivergenceDesign sprint | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | BrainstormingIdeationDivergenceSpeed |