View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Open Space Technology | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective | ![]() Facilitation Barcamp | ![]() Agile Mad Sad Glad |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. | When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 45–75 min | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 20-500+ | Team members involved | 15-200 | 3-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings | Emotion Board, Themes, Action Items |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | FacilitationLarge groupLearning | RetrospectiveTeamReflection |



