View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making OODA Loop |  UX Research Empathy Mapping |  Product Strategy DIBB |  Facilitation Decision Jam |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In dynamic situations, decisions become outdated faster than they can be prepared. The OODA Loop holds observing, orienting, deciding, and acting together as a recurring rhythm so reaction does not slide into inertia. | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-60 min je Zyklus | 30–60 min | 1-2 h | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 4-8 | 2-8 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Situation Assessment, Decision Loop, Action Updates | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionChangeLearningStrategy | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop |