View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Delivery RAID Log |  Facilitation Dot Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 60-90 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 5-15 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 | 3-6 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization |