View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Decision Making Pre-Mortem |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |  Decision Making Risk Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | When a project faces many possible disruptions, it quickly becomes unclear which risks deserve attention first. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Risk Matrix and a Top Risk List. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 20–45 min | 1-3 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 | Small cross-functional group | 5-30 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Risk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption log | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Risk Matrix, Top Risk List |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | RiskDecisionFailurePlanning | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | RiskDecisionPrioritizationAssessment |