View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Knowledge Modeling Knowledge Mapping |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | Knowledge Mapping makes knowledge, gaps, and transfer paths visible across a field. It fits when expertise should not just exist but also be findable and transferable. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 1-3 h | 5-15 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 | 3-12 | 3-20 | 1-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Knowledge Map, Critical Knowledge Areas, Transfer Plan | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | KnowledgeMappingRisk | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking |