View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Operations Kaizen Event |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Operations A3 Problem Solving |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | For a tightly scoped process segment with noticeable waste, the method bundles shared energy for change. It suits situations that call for fast learning loops and visible adjustments. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 0.5-5 Tage | 5-15 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 | 4-10 | 3-20 | 2-5 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Kaizen Charter, Waste List, Improvement Experiments, Standard Work Update | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | LeanContinuous improvementOperations | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations |