View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Product Discovery Kano Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 1-3 Wochen | 5-15 min | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 | 5-12 Interviews | 3-20 | 10-50 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | CustomerOutcomesNeeds | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer |