View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Product Strategy Impact Mapping |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 45-90 min | 5-15 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 | 3-8 | 3-20 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | StrategyAnalysisPlanning |