View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Growth Funnel Analysis |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |  Growth A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 1-3 h | 1-3 h | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 | 1-5 | 5-30 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Funnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypotheses | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | AnalyticsConversionGrowth | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation |