View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique |  Facilitation Open Space Technology |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 20-60 min | 0.5-2 Tage | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 | 1 | 20-500+ | 8-80 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy | FacilitationDialogueLarge group |