View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Domain Modeling Domain Context Map |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Domain Modeling Context Map |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | When a domain model and its associated contexts need to be thought through together, it creates a shared overview. It connects the business view and organizational boundary into a readable whole. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When several contexts need to talk to each other, it makes their relationships and dependencies legible. It helps sort integration pressure and responsibilities across system boundaries. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 1-3 h | 5-15 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 | 3-10 | 3-20 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Domain Context Map, Boundary Notes, Ownership Map | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Context Map, Integration Patterns, Boundary Notes |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | Domain-Driven DesignContextBoundaries | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | Domain-Driven DesignBoundariesStrategy |