View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 45-90 min | 5-15 min | 45-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 | 2-8 | 3-20 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation |