View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile NoEstimates |  Growth Flywheel |  Decision Making Three-Point Estimation |  Growth Hooked Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When estimating slows a team down more than it helps, it shifts the focus to flow, small slices, and real lead time. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Throughput Data, Flow Forecast, and Slicing Rules. | Growth often breaks down where a reinforcing mechanism builds up too much friction. A Flywheel shows the cycle of value, repetition, and reinforcement meant to sustain growth. | A single estimate for effort, time, or risk often looks too smooth for the real uncertainty behind it. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, and Assumption Notes. | The Hooked Model helps clarify engagement loops, user behavior, and experiments. It makes repeat behavior measurable and captures the result as a hooked loop, trigger map, and reward design. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | laufend | 60-120 min | 10-30 min je Item | Multiple workshops over several weeks |
Participantsdifferent | 2-12 | 3-8 | 1-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Throughput Data, Flow Forecast, Slicing Rules | Flywheel Map, Friction Points, Growth Levers, Experiment Backlog | Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, Assumption Notes | Hooked loop, Trigger map, Reward design, Ethics check |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationForecastingFlow | GrowthRetentionConversion | EstimationUncertaintyForecasting | GrowthBehaviorRetention |