methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for NoEstimates.
Agile
NoEstimates
Paper illustration for Causal Factor Analysis.
Operations
Causal Factor Analysis
Paper illustration for Incident Timeline Analysis.
DevOps
Incident Timeline Analysis
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Purposedifferent
When estimating slows a team down more than it helps, it shifts the focus to flow, small slices, and real lead time. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Throughput Data, Flow Forecast, and Slicing Rules.For an event with a complicated course, the method breaks down the contributing factors along the timeline. It shows how conditions, decisions, and reactions together produce a course of events.For an incident with an unclear sequence, the method makes the timeline precisely visible. It separates perception, reaction, and delay so cause and effect become more clearly readable.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMediumHigh
Timedifferent
laufend2-6 h60-180 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
2-123-103-103-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Throughput Data, Flow Forecast, Slicing RulesEvent Timeline, Causal Factor Chart, Cause List, Corrective ActionsIncident Timeline, Evidence Log, Delay Analysis, Improvement ActionsCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas
Tagsno overlap
EstimationForecastingFlow
CausalityIncidentRoot causeTimeline
IncidentTimelineSite Reliability Engineering
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
Add more methods