methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for NoEstimates.
Agile
NoEstimates
Paper illustration for Bucket System.
Agile
Bucket System
Paper illustration for Story Points.
Agile
Story Points
Paper illustration for Ideal Days.
Agile
Ideal Days
Purposedifferent
When estimating slows a team down more than it helps, it shifts the focus to flow, small slices, and real lead time. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Throughput Data, Flow Forecast, and Slicing Rules.When a large batch of work needs a fast, rough estimate, it sorts items into predefined size buckets. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a Bucketed Backlog, Relative Estimates, and Split Candidates.When teams want to rate complexity rather than hours, it creates a shared, relative scale. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Point Estimates, Reference Stories, and Velocity Data.When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
laufend30-90 minlaufend, 1-5 min je Item15-60 min
Participantsdifferent
2-123-123-92-9
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Throughput Data, Flow Forecast, Slicing RulesBucketed Backlog, Relative Estimates, Split CandidatesPoint Estimates, Reference Stories, Velocity DataIdeal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity Caveats
Tags1 shared
EstimationForecastingFlow
EstimationBacklogRelative sizing
EstimationAgileMeasurement
EstimationEffortAgile
Add more methods