methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of NeOn Methodology with its method-specific working model.
Knowledge Modeling
NeOn Methodology
Paper illustration for Risk Storming.
Architecture
Risk Storming
Paper illustration of a Test Card with four fields for hypothesis, test, metric, and success threshold.
Product Discovery
Test Card
Paper illustration of a calm four-quadrant Assumption Map with hypothesis cards and emphasis on important assumptions with little evidence.
Product Discovery
Assumption Mapping
Purposedifferent
The NeOn Methodology structures ontology work as a controlled process with reuse, scenarios, and reviews. It is useful when ontologies should not emerge ad hoc but modularly and reusably.Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog.The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success.When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
Mehrere Wochen bis Monate60-90 min20-35 min45-60 min
Participantsdifferent
2-104-121-52-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Ontology Requirements Specification, Reuse Plan, Ontology Modules, Evaluation ReportAnnotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action BacklogTest Card with a pre-set thresholdAssumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking
Tagsno overlap
OntologyMethodologyReuseSemanticEngineering
RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation
Add more methods