View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-75 min | 30-60 min je Interview | 1-5 Tage | 30-60 min je Interview |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 5-12 Interviews | Nutzertraffic | 5-12 Interviews |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Test Matrix, Test Plan | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments |
Tags1 shared | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation |