View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |  Growth Funnel Analysis |  Growth Growth Experiment |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. | When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses. | When growth ideas surface quickly, the temptation to build immediately instead of learning is high. A Growth Experiment frames an assumption so target group, lever, and measurement are clear before the first deployment. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-75 min | 1-3 h | 1-2 Wochen | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1-5 | 1-6 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Test Matrix, Test Plan | Funnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypotheses | Experiment card, Result summary, Next bet | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions | AnalyticsConversionGrowth | MarketingGrowthExperimentsLearning | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |