View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations MORT Analysis | ![]() Operations Fault Tree Analysis | ![]() Innovation Design Charrette | ![]() Operations Family Tree Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a safety-relevant event or a system with high protection requirements, the method examines where controls failed. It exposes both technical and organizational gaps. | For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage. | In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space. | For a series of incidents with a similar pattern, the method arranges individual events as branches of a common origin. It makes visible which conditions keep recurring. |
Complexitydifferent | High | High | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen | 2-6 h | Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | 3-8 | 10-50 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | MORT Worksheets, Findings per Branch, Corrective Actions, Systemic Recommendations | Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions | Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction | Family Tree Diagram, Pattern Notes, Systemic Measures |
Tagsno overlap | Root causeSafetySystemicIncident | RiskRoot causeSafety | BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation | Root causePatternsIncidentSystemic |



