View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Mind Mapping |  UX Design Lean UX Canvas |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. | The Lean UX Canvas helps clarify user behavior, touchpoints, and concept decisions. It makes assumptions and desired outcomes visible and captures the result as a completed canvas, hypothesis list, and first experiment. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 2-3 h | 5-15 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-10 | 3-8 | 3-20 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions | Completed Lean UX Canvas, Hypothesis list, First experiment | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes |
Tagsno overlap | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation | CanvasHypothesisOutcomesDiscovery | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds |