View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Mind Mapping |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |  Facilitation Dot Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 1-2 Tage | 60-120 min | 5-15 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-10 | 10-50 | 3-6 | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization |