methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper mind map with a central course onboarding question, colored main branches, keywords and cross-links.
Facilitation
Mind Mapping
Paper illustration for Fishbowl Discussion.
Facilitation
Fishbowl Discussion
Paper illustration for Peer Instruction.
Knowledge Modeling
Peer Instruction
Paper session grid with two time blocks, three rooms, colored session cards and an open topic pool.
Facilitation
Barcamp
Purposedifferent
When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early.When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover.Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision.When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
15-45 min45-90 min10-20 min je FrageHalber Tag bis 2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-108-806-5015-200
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open QuestionsDiscussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up QuestionsConcept Questions, Vote Results, Learning NotesSession Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings
Tags1 shared
BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation
FacilitationDialogueLarge group
LearningDialogueFacilitation
FacilitationLarge groupLearning
Add more methods