methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of the McKinsey 7S Framework with seven connected fields
Business Strategy
McKinsey 7S
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Paper illustration of Leverage Points with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
Leverage Points
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
McKinsey 7S checks whether Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff fit together. Organizational misalignments become visible across multiple levers as a result.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighHighMedium
Timedifferent
2-4 h2-6 hHalf day1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
3-123-83-124-12
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
7S Assessment, Alignment Gaps, Change ActionsCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasLeverage Map, Action StrategyAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
OrganizationStrategyAlignmentChange
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
Systems thinkingChangeStrategy
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods