View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Mad Sad Glad | ![]() Agile Sailboat Retrospective | ![]() Architecture Risk Storming | ![]() Agile Starfish Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible. | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. | Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog. | When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 45-90 min | 60-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 4-12 | 4-12 | 4-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Emotion Board, Themes, Action Items | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions | Annotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog | Starfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveTeamReflection | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement | RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation | RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam |



