View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Mad Sad Glad |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Facilitation World Café |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 45-90 min | 45–75 min | 60-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 8-80 | Team members involved | 12-100+ |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Emotion Board, Themes, Action Items | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Table Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared Questions |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveTeamReflection | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking |