methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
Paper illustration for Argument Mapping
Decision Making
Argument Mapping
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration for Cynefin Workshop.
Decision Making
Cynefin Workshop
Purposedifferent
When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
30-60 min1-3 h45–75 min60-180 min
Participantsdifferent
3-101-8Team members involved4-20
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Emotion Board, Themes, Action ItemsArgument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsCynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking Notes
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
SensemakingDecisionRationale
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
ComplexitySensemakingDecision
Add more methods