View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Systems Thinking Leverage Points | ![]() Business Strategy TOWS Matrix | ![]() Operations A3 Problem Solving | ![]() Business Strategy GAP Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy. | The TOWS Matrix connects internal strengths and weaknesses with external opportunities and threats into action-oriented strategies. It goes a step further than a pure stocktaking. | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | Half day | 1-2 h | 45-90 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-10 | 2-5 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Leverage Map, Action Strategy | TOWS Matrix, Strategic Options, Priority Actions | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes |
Tagsno overlap | Systems thinkingChangeStrategy | StrategyAnalysisOptions | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations | StrategyAnalysisPlanning |



