View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Leverage Points |  Innovation Starbursting |  Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree |  Innovation Design Charrette |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy. | Helps clarify ideas, open questions, and testable next steps in concrete terms. It opens the thinking space, collects ideas, and leads to testable options. The result is captured as a star-shaped question map, question list, and assumption list. | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. | In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | Half day | 30-60 min | 2-4 h | Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-10 | 3-8 | 10-50 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Leverage Map, Action Strategy | Star-Shaped Question Map, Question List, Assumption List | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections | Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction |
Tagsno overlap | Systems thinkingChangeStrategy | BrainstormingIdeationWorkshopDiscovery | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange | BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation |