methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Leverage Points with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
Leverage Points
Paper illustration for Sailboat Retrospective
Agile
Sailboat Retrospective
Paper illustration for Future Reality Tree.
Systems Thinking
Future Reality Tree
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Purposedifferent
Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy.When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture.A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowHighLow
Timedifferent
Half day45-90 min2-4 h45–75 min
Participantsdifferent
3-124-123-8Team members involved
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Leverage Map, Action StrategySailboat Board, Risks, Improvement ActionsFuture Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingChangeStrategy
RetrospectiveTeamImprovement
Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
Add more methods