methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Leverage Points with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
Leverage Points
Paper illustration of the McKinsey 7S Framework with seven connected fields
Business Strategy
McKinsey 7S
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy.McKinsey 7S checks whether Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff fit together. Organizational misalignments become visible across multiple levers as a result.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
Half day2-4 h15-45 min1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
3-123-121-34-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Leverage Map, Action Strategy7S Assessment, Alignment Gaps, Change ActionsADR File, Decision Log, RationaleAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingChangeStrategy
OrganizationStrategyAlignmentChange
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods