methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Leverage Points with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
Leverage Points
Paper illustration for Intervention Mapping.
Systems Thinking
Intervention Mapping
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration of Business Model Stress Test with its method-specific working model.
Business Strategy
Business Model Stress Test
Purposedifferent
Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy.Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.A Business Model Stress Test checks how well a business model holds up under pressure and headwinds. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and courses of action. The result is captured as a stress-test report and action plan per scenario.
Complexitysame
HighHighHighHigh
Timedifferent
Half day1-5 Tage2-6 hHalf day
Participantsdifferent
3-124-123-103-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Leverage Map, Action StrategyLogic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation PlanFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsStress Test Report, Action Plan per Scenario
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingChangeStrategy
ChangeSystems thinkingCapability
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
StrategyBusiness modelRiskDiagnosis
Add more methods