methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Leverage Points with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
Leverage Points
Paper illustration for Ideal Days.
Agile
Ideal Days
Paper illustration for Wideband Delphi.
Decision Making
Wideband Delphi
Paper illustration of the Force Field Analysis working structure.
Decision Making
Force Field Analysis
Purposedifferent
Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy.When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats.A single opinion rarely holds up for planning when the future is genuinely uncertain. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as an Estimate Range, Assumption Log, and Expert Consensus Notes.In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowHighLow
Timedifferent
Half day15-60 min1-4 h or multiple rounds45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-122-94-12 Experten3-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Leverage Map, Action StrategyIdeal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity CaveatsEstimate Range, Assumption Log, Expert Consensus NotesForce Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingChangeStrategy
EstimationEffortAgile
EstimationExpertsForecasting
ChangeDecisionStrategy
Add more methods