methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Leverage Points with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
Leverage Points
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration for OODA Loop.
Decision Making
OODA Loop
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Purposedifferent
Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy.When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.In dynamic situations, decisions become outdated faster than they can be prepared. The OODA Loop holds observing, orienting, deciding, and acting together as a recurring rhythm so reaction does not slide into inertia.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
Half day5-15 min15-60 min je Zyklus60-120 min
Participantsdifferent
3-123-201-85-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Leverage Map, Action StrategyRanked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistSituation Assessment, Decision Loop, Action UpdatesRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingChangeStrategy
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
DecisionChangeLearningStrategy
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
Add more methods