methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Leverage Points with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
Leverage Points
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Paper illustration of the Force Field Analysis working structure.
Decision Making
Force Field Analysis
Purposedifferent
Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy.For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumHighLow
Timedifferent
Half day30-90 min2-6 h45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-121-63-83-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Leverage Map, Action StrategyDecision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasForce Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingChangeStrategy
DecisionTreeOptions
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
ChangeDecisionStrategy
Add more methods