View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Systems Thinking Leverage Points | ![]() Systems Thinking Current Reality Tree | ![]() Architecture arc42 | ![]() Systems Thinking Theory of Constraints Thinking Process |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy. | A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. | The Theory of Constraints Thinking Process exposes a system's bottleneck and the logic behind it. It suits situations where many symptoms trace back to the same limiting relationship. |
Complexitydifferent | High | High | Low | High |
Timedifferent | Half day | 2-6 h | 1-2 Tage | 0.5-3 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-8 | 1-4 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Leverage Map, Action Strategy | Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View | Current Reality Logic, Conflict Cloud, Future Reality Tree, Implementation Obstacles |
Tagsno overlap | Systems thinkingChangeStrategy | Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication | Theory of ConstraintsConstraintsSystems thinkingCausality |



