View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Systems Thinking Leverage Points | ![]() UX Research Contextual Inquiry | ![]() Product Strategy Impact Mapping | ![]() UX Research Diary Study |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy. | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. | When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | Half day | 1-3 Wochen | 45-90 min | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 3-8 | 5-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Leverage Map, Action Strategy | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options | Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience Timeline |
Tagsno overlap | Systems thinkingChangeStrategy | UX researchObservationContext | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning | UX researchTrackingBehavior |



