methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Learning Review.
Operations
Learning Review
The Scrum Team inspects people, interactions, processes, tools, and the Definition of Done, then agrees on a few testable improvements.
Agile
Sprint Retrospective
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Purposedifferent
After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights.When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
1-3 hUp to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter10-20 min daily45–75 min
Participantsdifferent
3-10Scrum Team1Team members involved
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Learning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement ActionsImprovement actions, Team agreementsDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations
RetrospectiveImprovementLearning
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
Add more methods