methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Learning Review.
Operations
Learning Review
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
Purposedifferent
After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h45–75 min20-45 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-10Team members involved1-83-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Learning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement Actions4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesEmotion Board, Themes, Action Items
Tagsno overlap
LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
Add more methods