View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Design Lean UX Canvas | ![]() Product Discovery Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas | ![]() Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion | ![]() Product Discovery Test Card |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Lean UX Canvas helps clarify user behavior, touchpoints, and concept decisions. It makes assumptions and desired outcomes visible and captures the result as a completed canvas, hypothesis list, and first experiment. | When many hypotheses compete for attention, it brings order to their learning sequence and importance. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritization canvas and a hypothesis backlog. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-3 h | 60-90 min | 45-90 min | 20-35 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 3-8 | 8-80 | 1-5 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Completed Lean UX Canvas, Hypothesis list, First experiment | Prioritization Canvas, Hypothesis Backlog | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Test Card with a pre-set threshold |
Tagsno overlap | CanvasHypothesisOutcomesDiscovery | ExperimentsPrioritizationDiscoveryHypothesis | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis |



