methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Lean Startup with its method-specific working model.
Innovation
Lean Startup
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Paper illustration for Concierge MVP
Product Discovery
Concierge MVP
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
For uncertain business assumptions, the method forces the idea into contact with real market reactions early. It separates wishful picture, assumption, and observable behavior, so that learning becomes faster than planning. This translates uncertainty into measurable insight.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
Wochen bis Monate je Lernzyklus30-60 min je Interview1-4 Wochen1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
2-85-12 Interviews3-10 KundenNutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Hypothesis list, MVPs, Learning reports, Pivot or persevere decisionProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsConcierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP RisksClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tags1 shared
LeanStartupValidationMVP
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
MVPValidationServiceDiscovery
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods