View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Lean Startup |  Operations Learning Review |  Operations 5 Whys |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For uncertain business assumptions, the method forces the idea into contact with real market reactions early. It separates wishful picture, assumption, and observable behavior, so that learning becomes faster than planning. This translates uncertainty into measurable insight. | After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights. | For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Wochen bis Monate je Lernzyklus | 1-3 h | 15-30 min | 45–75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-10 | 2-6 | Team members involved |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Hypothesis list, MVPs, Learning reports, Pivot or persevere decision | Learning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement Actions | Root cause notes, Countermeasures | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | LeanStartupValidationMVP | LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations | Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam |