View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy Lean Canvas | ![]() Operations Kaizen Event | ![]() DevOps Game Day | ![]() Operations Gemba Walk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an early product bet still has too many open points, it brings target group, problem, and assumptions into a single view. It condenses the idea so core risks become nameable. | For a tightly scoped process segment with noticeable waste, the method bundles shared energy for change. It suits situations that call for fast learning loops and visible adjustments. | In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 0.5-5 Tage | Halber Tag | 30-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-6 | 4-10 | 5-20 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Lean Canvas, Core Assumptions, Experiment Backlog | Kaizen Charter, Waste List, Improvement Experiments, Standard Work Update | Simulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated Runbooks | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | StartupLeanAssumptionsBusiness model | LeanContinuous improvementOperations | ResilienceOperationsIncident | LeanObservationProcessOperations |



