methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a Lean Canvas with nine fields, notes, and one highlighted learning risk.
Product Strategy
Lean Canvas
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
Purposedifferent
When an early product bet still has too many open points, it brings target group, problem, and assumptions into a single view. It condenses the idea so core risks become nameable.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min120 min initial, dann laufend1-2 h90-180 min
Participantsdifferent
1-63-64-123-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Lean Canvas, Core Assumptions, Experiment BacklogHEART-GSM Table, DashboardAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsGQM Table, Metric Profiles
Tagsno overlap
StartupLeanAssumptionsBusiness model
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
Add more methods